In a charged dialogue with the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee, representatives from industry titans like Kraft Heinz and Unilever faced serious accusations of shrinkflation. The term refers to the practice of reducing product sizes while maintaining or increasing prices, and has become a hot-button issue as consumers struggle with rising living costs. Major brands, however, are pushing back against these claims, presenting various explanations for the size reductions that have nothing to do with stealthy price hikes.
Kraft Heinz, responsible for beloved products such as Heinz beans, has been under scrutiny for the reduction of beans in their tins from 51% to 50% in a 415g tin. Dominic Hawkins, the UK head of the supply chain, fervently denied that this change constituted shrinkflation, asserting that the intent was to “make it taste better” and “to improve the quality of our product.” The alteration did not come with a price reduction, leading some to question the motivation behind the change.
Unilever’s UK and Ireland head, Marc Woodward, when questioned about the decrease in Hellman’s mayonnaise from 800g to 600g, pointed to a significant uptick in the cost of a major ingredient. He strongly indicated that pack size adjustments are only employed when justified by ingredient costs, stating, “We would never go to using just the pack size to achieve a price if it wasn’t justified through the cost.” Adding that: “We only ever pass through pricing as a last resort. We are acutely aware of how sensitive price is at the moment, and value. And you simply cannot run a successful organisation in this market by pushing forward prices that are not justified.”
The Lurpak butter brand also engaged in the practice of reducing pack sizes, although Bas Padberg, UK managing director of Arla Foods, highlighted that this move included a price cut and was aimed at providing budget-conscious consumers with continued access to the product. “It is really trying to serve consumers that are tightening their belts… to allow them to continue to get access to the product, and it was effective in that sense,” he said.
Despite mounting consumer pressure and the reality of financial strain due to inflation rates that saw food inflation at double the overall inflation in December, these companies remain steadfast in their position. They claim that changes to product sizes and contents are made transparent through online updates and labels.”Shoppers are super savvy, and they know exactly what’s going on,” Mr Woodward said.
While these assertions of transparency and necessity may stand, frustration among consumers is palpable. Industry giants are feeling the heat not just for size reductions but also for substantial profit margins. This discontent is mirrored in the legal realm as well, with a spate of lawsuits emerging against companies over alleged misleading claims about their products.
Relevant articles:
– Major brands deny ‘shrinkflation’ as Heinz says reducing the number of beans in a tin doesn’t count
– Food bosses are accused of taking shoppers for ‘mugs’ as they deny ‘shrinkflation’ despite selling smaller products for similar prices, Daily Mail, Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:33:23 GMT
– Fed-up consumers are increasingly going after food companies for misleading claims, NPR, Wed, 20 Sep 2023 07:00:00 GMT
– Think your Pringles have shrunk? You’re right – and here’s why, Yahoo News Australia, Wed, 30 Aug 2023 07:00:00 GMT